Growth performance, apparent retention of components, and excreta dry matter content in Shaver White pullets (5 to 16 week of age) in response to dietary supplementation of graded levels of a single strain Bacillus subtilis probiotic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Administered in adequate amounts, probiotics can be an alternative to antibiotic growth promoters in poultry production. This study evaluated dose response of a single strain of Bacillus subtilis (SSB, DSM29784) on growth performance, apparent retention (AR) of components, and excreta DM content in pullets. A basal corn-soybean meal diet was formulated to meet the specifications for grower (week 5 to 10) and developer (week 11 to 16) phases. In each phase, SSB was added to the basal diet to create 4 test diets: 0 (control, CON), 1.1E+08 (low; LSSB), 2.2E+08 (medium; MSSB), or 1.1E+09 (high; HSSB) CFU of SSB/kg of feed. All diets had TiO2 (0.5%) as a digestibility marker. A total of 720 day-old Shaver White chicks were placed in 48 cages (15 pullets per cage) and reared on a commercial antibiotic free diet for a 4-wk period. At the beginning of week 5, treatments were allocated based on cage BW (n = 12). Birds had free access to feed and water throughout. The BW, BW uniformity, feed intake (FI) and FCR were obtained weekly. Excreta was collected at the end of each phase for AR of DM, organic matter, CP, neutral detergent fiber, minerals, and AME, as well as excreta DM content. In response to SSB inclusion, BW improved in a linear (P < 0.005) and quadratic (P < 0.0001) manner in grower. FI decreased in a linear and quadratic pattern (P < 0.05, week 8 to 10) in grower, and linearly (P < 0.05) across the developer phase. Overall FCR improved in linear and quadratic pattern (P < 0.01) in the grower phase. In both the phases, AME improved in a quadratic pattern (P < 0.05). Inclusion of SSB had a linear reduction (P < 0.0001) in excreta moisture content in the grower phase. In summary, these results demonstrate that B. subtilis probiotic improved performance through enhanced nutrient utilization and reduced excreta moisture content indicating improved pullet gut health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".