MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2922212985 · doi:10.1002/lary.27912

The association between the Nutrition‐Related index and morbidity following head and neck microsurgery

2019· article· en· W2922212985 on OpenAlexaff
Harman S. Parhar, J. Scott Durham, Donald W. Anderson, Barret Rush, Eitan Prisman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Laryngoscope · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutrition and Health in Aging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrosurgeryHead and neckMedicineIndex (typography)Head (geology)Association (psychology)SurgeryPsychologyBiologyComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Despite consensus that preoperative nutritional assessment is of importance in the head and neck surgical oncology population, it remains unclear how exactly malnutrition is associated with perioperative morbidity especially among those undergoing microvascular surgery. We aimed to study this association to help inform preoperative risk stratification, guide the use of nutritional interventions, and ultimately help prevent malnutrition related morbidity. STUDY DESIGN: Database analysis. METHODS: Retrospective, linked analysis of the 2011 to 2016 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. After identifying eligible patients and stratifying according to the Nutrition-Related Index, a univariate screen of preoperative demographic and clinical covariates was performed. Subsequently, propensity score matching was utilized to control for differences in baseline covariates. Perioperative complications and mortality were then analyzed using the propensity score-matched cohorts. RESULTS: Among 977 identified patients, 276 (28.2%) were malnourished. Malnourished patients had higher rates of comorbidity, were more likely to actively smoke, and were more likely to have primaries in the oropharynx or hypopharynx/larynx. After propensity score matching to control for confounders, malnourished patients had higher rates of pulmonary complications (21.5% vs. 11.6%, P < .01), higher rates of bleeding or need for transfusion (56.6% vs. 43.0%, P < .01), higher rates of venous thromboembolism (3.7% vs. 0.8%, P = .03), and a higher 30-day mortality rates (3.7% vs. 0.0%, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide analysis finds that 28.2% of patients undergoing surgery for head and neck cancers with free flap reconstruction are malnourished. Malnourishment was found to be independently associated with postoperative pulmonary complications, bleeding or need for transfusion, and 30-day mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 130:375-380, 2020.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.485

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe LaryngoscopeSame topicNutrition and Health in AgingFrench-language works237,207