MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2922228594 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz006.178

A179 EXPLORING RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN HANDGRIP STRENGTH, MID-UPPER ARM CIRCUMFERENCE, SUBJECTIVE GLOBAL ASSESSMENT AND ADVERSE CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN CIRRHOSIS: A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

2019· article· en· W2922228594 on OpenAlexaffabout
E Wishart, Lorian Taylor, Louisa Lam, Kaleb J. Marr, Melanie Stapleton, Quinn Fitzgerald, Elaine Chiu, Puneeta Tandon, Maitreyi Raman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutrition and Health in Aging
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health ServicesUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCirrhosisProspective cohort studyMalnutritionCohortInternal medicineCohort studyHepatic encephalopathyAnthropometrySarcopeniaPhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Malnutrition is highly prevalent in cirrhosis and is an independent predictor of negative clinical outcomes. Nutrition assessment (NA) is often not performed in patients with cirrhosis and this may result from a lack of clarity surrounding valid bedside tools. The study aimed to identify relationships between baseline NA measurements and adverse clinical outcomes in patients with cirrhosis. A prospective cohort study was conducted between 2014–2018 at the University of Calgary. Ambulatory pre-liver transplant patients with cirrhosis were co-assessed by a registered dietitian and a physician nutrition specialist in a specialized malnutrition clinic, and completed measurements of subjective global assessment (SGA), handgrip strength (HGS) and mid upper arm circumference (MUAC). Clinical outcomes including frequency of hospitalizations, length of stay, infections, and hepatic encephalopathy were collected in the 6–12 months following nutrition assessment. Mortality was examined from baseline to 3 years. T-tests and chi-squared analyses were used to examine relationships between NA tools and clinical outcomes. This study included 66 patients, mean age 54 (±10.1) years, and 56% (n=37) male. Baseline demographic characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Malnourished SGA status (9.5% (n=2) SGA A vs. 90.5% (n=19) who were SGA B and C) and lower HGS category (23.8% (n=5) who had a higher HGS vs. 76.2% (n=16) with a lower HGS) both had significantly higher proportions of mortality (SGA: (χ2(2)=6.6, p<0.05); HGS: (χ2(1)= 15.9, p<0.001), while MUAC was not significantly related to mortality (χ2(1) =1.9, p=0.17). The probability of a mortality event was 3.2 times more likely when they were in a lower HGS category. Higher MELD category was also associated with increased mortality (χ2(1) =4.1, p=0.04). SGA, HGS and MUAC were not significantly related to the other clinical outcomes. In our study, malnutrition diagnosed by both SGA and HGS is predictive of mortality in cirrhosis. Incorporating SGA and HGS into routine clinical practice for pre-liver transplant patients with cirrhosis to identify patients who may benefit form nutrition therapy should be considered. Demographic and Health Characteristics Baxter Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicNutrition and Health in AgingFrench-language works237,207