Prolonged low-frequency force depression is underestimated when assessed with doublets compared with tetani in the dorsiflexors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prolonged low-frequency force depression (PLFFD) after damaging eccentric exercise may last for several days. Historically, PLFFD has been calculated from the tetanic force responses to trains of supramaximal stimuli. More recently, for methodological reasons, stimulation has been reduced to two pulses. However, it is unknown whether doublet responses provide a valid measure of PLFFD in the days after eccentric exercise. In 12 participants, doublets and tetani were elicited at 10 and 100 Hz before and after (2, 3, 5 min, 48 and 96 h) 200 eccentric maximal voluntary contractions of the dorsiflexors. Doublet and tetanic torque responses at 10 Hz were similarly depressed throughout recovery ( P > 0.05; e.g., 2 min: 58.9 ± 12.8% vs. 57.1 ± 14.5% baseline; 96 h: 85.6 ± 11.04% vs. 85.1 ± 10.8% baseline). At 100 Hz, doublet torque was impaired more than tetanic torque at all time points ( P < 0.05; e.g., 2 min: 70.5 ± 14.2% vs. 88.1 ± 11.7% baseline; 96 h: 83.0 ± 14.2% vs. 98.7 ± 9.5% baseline). As a result, the postfatigue reduction of the 10 Hz-to-100 Hz ratio (PLFFD) was markedly greater for tetani than for doublets ( P < 0.05; e.g., 2 min: 64.3 ± 15.1% vs. 83.0 ± 5.8% baseline). In addition, the doublet ratio recovered by 48 h (99.2 ± 5.0% baseline), whereas the tetanic ratio was still impaired at 96 h (88.2 ± 9.7% baseline). Our results indicate that doublets are not a valid measure of PLFFD in the minutes and days after eccentric exercise. If study design favors the use of paired stimuli, it should be acknowledged that the true magnitude and duration of PLFFD are likely underestimated. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Prolonged low-frequency force depression (PLFFD) will result from damaging exercise and may last for several days. After 200 eccentric maximal dorsiflexor contractions, we compared the gold-standard measure of PLFFD (calculated using trains of supramaximal stimulation) to the value obtained from an alternative technique that is becoming increasingly common (paired supramaximal stimuli). Doublets underestimated the magnitude and duration of PLFFD compared with tetani, so caution must be used when reporting PLFFD derived from paired stimuli.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".