MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2922298562 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz006.096

A97 QUALITY OVER QUANTITY: THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN QUALITY OF REFERRALS RECEIVED BY IBD SPECIALISTS AND PATIENT OUTCOMES

2019· article· en· W2922298562 on OpenAlexaffabout
Holly Mathias, Courtney Heisler, J B Morrison, Barbara Currie, K Phalen-Kelly, Jeremy Jones

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicHealthcare Systems and Technology
Canadian institutionsQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentreHealth Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineReferralTriageSpecialtyFamily medicineDiseaseInflammatory bowel diseaseQuality managementQuality (philosophy)Emergency medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most speciality inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) care can only be accessed through a referral. Timely access to specialty care has been associated with improved disease-related outcomes. To receive appropriate care, the referral needs to include high quality information. To date, no research has explored the association between referral quality and IBD patient outcomes. The study objectives were to determine if the quality of referrals to a collaborative IBD program influenced triage accuracy, wait times, and patient outcomes. 200 referrals to a collaborative IBD program in Nova Scotia, Canada for patients with confirmed or suspected IBD were reviewed. Referral quality was evaluated as low, moderate or high quality using an evidence and consensus-based metric. The association between referral quality and patient outcomes (wait time, hospitalizations, disease flares and additional referrals) was assessed using multivariate regression analysis. The majority of referrals for IBD speciality care received by the program were categorized as being low quality. The findings of this study also suggest that quality of referral influences wait times and patient outcomes including disease flares and IBD-related hospitalizations. In particular, we noted that moderate-high quality referrals that included a diagnosis, were legible, were sent by GIs, nurse practitioners or emergency room physicians, had shorter wait times. Low quality referrals were associated with longer wait times. Additionally, we noted that patients who had referrals that included a diagnosis and were legible had fewer disease flares and IBD-related hospitalizations than referrals that did not included this information, presumably due to shorter wait time. Patients with a low quality referral to IBD speciality care may experience longer wait times and increased healthcare resource utilization than patients with higher quality referrals. Improvements in referral-based communication and content quality are needed. Defining minimum referral quality expectations and facilitation of high quality referrals through the development of standardized referral forms could be a solution to this problem. Specialist recommendations for first-line investigations and treatments for IBD patients waiting to be seen in post-triage communication to referring physicians could reduce healthcare resource utilization. None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.368
Threshold uncertainty score0.880

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicHealthcare Systems and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207