Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose of the paper consists in presentation of the Project transfrontalier RO-MD, analysis and substantiation of the objectives assumed by the Republic of Moldova and Romania through the Association Agreement between the Republic of Moldova and the European Union.The Republic of Moldova is about to determine: What future it wants for itself (country) and for its citizens.The research focuses on the correlational and explanatory method of the impact of EU (future) integration (benefits), identification of problems arising from implementation / compliance with the provisions of the Association Agreement; finding solutions to harmonize legislation; excluding differences relating to: unifying EU and national standards; ensuring the free movement of persons, services; expanding cooperation in the euro area; unifying policies on migration and asylum; uniform interpretation and application of EU and national legislation; ensuring that decisions are taken collectively (appropriate application of Japanese management) .Strengthening the objectives of promoting EU integration policies, thus contributing to the economic and social development of the country.Based on the research carried out, we conclude: Romania and the Republic of Moldova together with the European Union will address unitary reforms, included in the EU strategies, the country's objectives -economic and social, focused on the strategies and programs included in the Association Agreement.The results of the research are only the author's opinion which, however, can generate discussions in academic, student's, and social environment, can generate the interest of the citizens of Romania and the Republic of Moldova.The paper discusses the impediments to the implementation of the provisions of the Association Agreement, and solutions are also proposed.Resides in detailed and reasoned analysis; conclusions and proposing new solutions in order to reduce the problems encountered in implementing the Association Agreement.Originality consists in: identifying the norms contained in the legislative-normative acts with ambiguous understanding and interpretation and proposals for a law ferenda to improve and eliminate the ambiguities and other legislative-normative deficiencies; proposals to unify jurisprudence; proposals to harmonize national legislation with EU law.Implementation Environment: Country Awareness and Involvement (Legislative and Executive), taking into account the importance and seriousness of the problems of applying the EU policies and strategies set out in the Association Agreement, the negative impact of noncompliance with the roadmap on economic and social development of RM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.075 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".