MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2922450438 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz006.192

A193 TIMELY HEPATITIS B IMMUNIZATION OF THE AT-RISK NEONATE: A QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW

2019· article· en· W2922450438 on OpenAlexaffabout
P. G. Azzopardi, Lauren Ly, Peter Azzopardi, Bruno DiGravio, M Roy, Herbert Brill

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis B Virus Studies
Canadian institutionsWilliam Osler Health SystemMcMaster Children's HospitalGrand River HospitalMcMaster UniversityThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHBsAgHepatitis BVaccinationHepatitis B vaccinePediatricsHepatitis B virusHepatitis B immune globulinImmunizationPregnancyObstetricsImmunologyImmune systemVirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hepatitis B is an infectious disease that affects approximately 257 million people worldwide and is ranked as the fourth most burdensome pathogen in Ontario, with clinical sequelae including liver cirrhosis, organ failure, and cancer. Although Ontario offers routine hepatitis B vaccination in adolescence, infants born to infected mothers remain at risk due to vertical transmission of the virus during childbirth. This necessitates routine HBsAg screening in the first trimester of pregnancy. According to the Canadian Immunization Guide (CIG), all infants born to HBsAg+ mothers should receive hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIg) and vaccine within 12 hours of age. It is unclear whether these measures are administered in a timely manner. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively review the time to administer HBIg and vaccine for infants born to HBsAg+ mothers. Following REB approval, mother-infant charts were selected by identifying orders for hepatitis B vaccine in infants between 2010 and 2015. Mother-infant dyads were excluded if the mother was HBsAg- or status unknown. Paired charts were retrospectively reviewed at 6 hospital sites in Ontario including 2 community hospitals, 2 academic hospitals, and 2 affiliated teaching hospitals. Non-parametric analysis of variance (ANOVA) and correlation tests were run at a significance of p<0.05. 460 mother-infant dyads were included for full chart review across 6 hospital sites. The mean vaccination time was 5.0 hours (95% CI [4.4, 5.2]) with significant differences between sites (WF5,58=21.3, p<0.001, η2= 0.31). The mean time of HBIg administration was also 5.0 hours (95% CI [4.5, 5.2]) with significant differences between sites (Welch’s F5,61=18.7, p<0.001, η2= 0.23). 23 infant charts (5.0%) documented late hepatitis B vaccination and 22 infant charts (4.8%) documented late HBIg administration, with 2.4% of at-risk infant charts documenting both late vaccine and HBIg administration. On average, infants born to married mothers were vaccinated earlier (x=-65 mins). Early morning delivery (2400-0800) tended to result in later vaccination times (x=+66 mins). 10.8% of at-risk infant charts had at least one undocumented time of HBIg or vaccine administration. At-risk newborns for the vertical transmission of hepatitis B infrequently encounter immunization delays, including the late administration of HBIg or vaccine within the first 12 hours of life. A focus on standardizing care pathways regardless of site or time of delivery may help to improve the timeliness of hepatitis B immunization. Further study could explore the cost-benefits of universal neonatal hepatitis B immunization. None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.025
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.080
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0250.080
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0100.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicHepatitis B Virus Studies→French-language works237,207→