Tight Fusion of a Monocular Camera, MEMS-IMU, and Single-Frequency Multi-GNSS RTK for Precise Navigation in GNSS-Challenged Environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Precise position, velocity, and attitude is essential for self-driving cars and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). The integration of global navigation satellite system (GNSS) real-time kinematics (RTK) and inertial measurement units (IMUs) is able to provide high-accuracy navigation solutions in open-sky conditions, but the accuracy will be degraded severely in GNSS-challenged environments, especially integrated with the low-cost microelectromechanical system (MEMS) IMUs. In order to navigate in GNSS-denied environments, the visual–inertial system has been widely adopted due to its complementary characteristics, but it suffers from error accumulation. In this contribution, we tightly integrate the raw measurements from the single-frequency multi-GNSS RTK, MEMS-IMU, and monocular camera through the extended Kalman filter (EKF) to enhance the navigation performance in terms of accuracy, continuity, and availability. The visual measurement model from the well-known multistate constraint Kalman filter (MSCKF) is combined with the double-differenced GNSS measurement model to update the integration filter. A field vehicular experiment was carried out in GNSS-challenged environments to evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithm. Results indicate that both multi-GNSS and vision contribute significantly to the centimeter-level positioning availability in GNSS-challenged environments. Meanwhile, the velocity and attitude accuracy can be greatly improved by using the tightly-coupled multi-GNSS RTK/INS/Vision integration, especially for the yaw angle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".