Characteristics, risks, and outcomes of post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disease >3 years after pediatric heart transplant: A multicenter analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a significant complication after pediatric heart transplantation (HT), occurring in 5%-15% of patients within 3 years. Data >3 years from HT are limited. We sought to describe the prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of PTLD occurring late (>3 years) after pediatric HT in the Pediatric Heart Transplant Study from 1993 to 2010. Among 3844 primary HT patients, 110 (3%) developed late, nonrecurrent PTLD. The hazard rate for late PTLD was constant at 0.01 events/year out to 20 years after HT. Risk factors for late PTLD were younger age at HT (HR 1.06, P = 0.003) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) naivety (HR 1.65, P = 0.02). Survival after late PTLD was 86% and 68% at 1 and 5 years, with nonwhite race (HR 2.27, P = 0.03) and earlier year of HT (HR 1.03, P = 0.04) independently associated with mortality. Acute rejection and infection were both common after late PTLD, occurring in 26% and 34% of patients. The constant late hazard and contribution of EBV to late PTLD suggest that vigilance for development of PTLD, including for EBV conversion, should persist indefinitely after pediatric HT. The reasons for elevated risk of death for nonwhites after late PTLD are unclear and warrant further investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".