The cost of obesity in radical cystectomy.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
434 Background: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that nearly 40% of the U.S. population meets the criteria for obesity classification. Several studies have shown that obesity is associated with increased medical morbidity and costs. In this study, we investigated the impact of obesity on the financial burden of radical cystectomy. We hypothesize that the cost of radical cystectomy is greater in obese and morbidly obese patients compared to overweight patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study within the Premier Healthcare Database (Premier Inc., Charlotte, NC), a large, U.S. hospital-based, all-payer database representing approximately 20% of annual inpatient discharges. ICD-9 procedure codes were used to identify all patients who had undergone elective radical cystectomy (57.71, 57.79) from 2003 to 2015, and administrative data was used to extract the costs associated with the index hospitalization. Patients were stratified into three body mass index (BMI) categories: overweight (25 BMI <30), obese (30 ≤ BMI < 40) and morbidly obese (BMI ≥ 40). Quantile regression analysis was performed to examine the effect of BMI category on cost. Results: We identified 12,056 patients who underwent radical cystectomy, 1,406 of whom had data available regarding BMI category. The crude cost of the index hospitalization for radical cystectomy was $24,596 for overweight patients. The costs associated with patients in the obese and morbidly obese categories were $2,158 ( p=0.059) and $5,308 ( p<0.001) higher compared to overweight patients, respectively. Median operative time for overweight, obese, and morbidly obese patients was 346, 391, and 420 minutes, respectively (p=0.0001). Multivariable models were constructed controlling for clinicodemographic, and surgical factors. After adjustment for operative time, there were no longer any statistically significant differences in cost between the BMI categories. Conclusions: The cost of radical cystectomy is significantly greater for obese and morbidly obese patients compared to overweight patients. This increased financial cost associated with obesity difference is driven by increased operative times encountered in obese patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".