MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2922567366 · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0094-2

Publisher Correction: Federated discovery and sharing of genomic data using Beacons

2019· erratum· en· W2922567366 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marc Fiume, Miroslav Cupák, Stephen Keenan, Jordi Rambla, Sabela de la Torre, Stephanie O. M. Dyke, Anthony J. Brookes, Knox Carey, David Lloyd, Peter Goodhand, Maximilian Haeussler, Michael Baudis, Heinz Stockinger, Lena Dolman, Ilkka Lappalainen, Juha Törnroos, Mikael Lindén, Dylan Spalding, Saif Ur-Rehman, Angela Page, Paul Flicek, Stephen T. Sherry, David Haussler, S.D. Varma, Gary Saunders, Serena Scollen

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Biotechnology · 2019
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchMcGill UniversityOntario GenomicsMcGill Genome CentreMarch of Dimes Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeaconData sharingComputer scienceComputational biologyWorld Wide WebData scienceInformation retrievalBiologyTelecommunicationsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the version of this article initially published, Lena Dolman's second affiliation was given as Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK. The correct second affiliation is Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. The error has been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.090
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.167

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.090
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0080.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0500.037

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature BiotechnologySame topicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataFrench-language works237,207