MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2922618162 · doi:10.1021/acs.jnatprod.9b00067

Special Issue in Honor of Professor Rachel Mata

2019· article· en· W2922618162 on OpenAlexaffabout
John T. Arnason, Mario Figueroa, Rogelio Pereda‐Miranda, Nicholas H. Oberlies

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Natural Products · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect Utilization and Effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHonorPhilosophyArtEnvironmental ethicsClassicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEEditorialNEXTSpecial Issue in Honor of Professor Rachel MataJohn T. ArnasonJohn T. ArnasonDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CanadaMore by John T. Arnasonhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-5354-5715, Mario FigueroaMario FigueroaFacultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, MéxicoMore by Mario Figueroahttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-7004-0591, Rogelio Pereda-MirandaRogelio Pereda-MirandaFacultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, MéxicoMore by Rogelio Pereda-Mirandahttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-0542-0085, and Nicholas H. OberliesNicholas H. OberliesUniversity of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina, United StatesMore by Nicholas H. Oberlieshttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-0354-8464Cite this: J. Nat. Prod. 2019, 82, 3, 423–424Publication Date (Web):March 22, 2019Publication History Published online22 March 2019Published inissue 22 March 2019https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.9b00067https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.9b00067editorialACS PublicationsCopyright © 2019 American Chemical Society and American Society of Pharmacognosy. This publication is available under these Terms of Use. Request reuse permissions This publication is free to access through this site. Learn MoreArticle Views1234Altmetric-Citations-LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail PDF (1 MB) Get e-AlertscloseSUBJECTS:Fungi,Inhibitors,Pharmaceuticals Get e-Alerts

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.584
Threshold uncertainty score0.593

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5840.517

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Natural ProductsSame topicInsect Utilization and EffectsFrench-language works237,207