The Anterolateral Thigh Flap for Achilles Tendon Reconstruction: Functional Outcomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Following Achilles tendon rupture and repair, reruptures or infections are not infrequent. Consequently, several surgical techniques have been described to decrease complication rates. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of the free composite fasciocutaneous anterolateral thigh flap including fascia lata for reconstruction of combined complex soft-tissue and Achilles tendon defects. METHODS: Within an 8-year period, 34 patients having undergone microvascular Achilles tendon reconstruction fulfilled inclusion criteria for this study: 25 of these patients (73.5 percent) returned for follow-up examination, seven of whom (28.0 percent) underwent additional bilateral contact pressure and power measurements. The data were screened for patients' demographics, intraoperative and perioperative details, flap survival, surgical complications, and overall long-term outcomes. RESULTS: Mean follow-up time was 40.8 months. The Thompson test was negative in all patients. The pain score assessed by the Numerical Rating Scale at the reconstructed site was low overall, but showed significant differences between rest and activity (p < 0.05). The assessment of the Vancouver Scar Scale showed very good results with both techniques. The measurements of the peak pressures, power while walking, and foot contact area did not show differences between the operated and nonoperated sides (p > 0.05), whereas range of motion revealed significant differences (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients who suffer complex Achilles tendon injury requiring free flap coverage, the composite anterolateral thigh flap including fascia lata provides a reliable and safe approach with very good functional and aesthetic outcomes. It should be considered one of the first reconstructive options. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".