MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2922911791

More than just a Fine Drink: Processes of Cultural Translation, Taste Formation and Idealized Consumption in the Wine World

2018· dissertation· en· W2922911791 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sarah Cappeliez

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace (University of Toronto) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicWine Industry and Tourism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWineTasteConsumption (sociology)AestheticsArtFood sciencePsychologyAdvertisingVisual artsBusinessChemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

My dissertation, presented as three interrelated studies prepared as standalone articles, uses the cultural practice of wine to examine how ideas, tastes and consumption practices travel and are adopted in new places. Through field observations, interviews and discourse analysis in the established Châteauneuf-du-Pape and the emerging Niagara, I begin by examining how the concept of terroir is expressed and used across a French and a Canadian regional cultural context in Chapter 3. Through a comparative analysis of terroir, a complex French cultural term used to identify and classify artisanal foods and drinks in relation to a specific place, this first study clarifies the factors that drive consistency and change in the translation of a cultural idea like terroir, advancing our understanding of what translates and what must be adapted when a cultural idea travels in a globalized context. In Chapters 4 and 5, I further deepen this questioning by examining how wine consumers and producers in the emerging, non-traditionally wine producing Ontario wine market consider the development of a taste for wine, a cultural good that is often viewed as complex and intimidating. In Chapter 4, I consider how consumers frame their interest in wine to understand how cultural practices and tastes “take”, and become more interesting to cultural consumers. I show that consumers frame their interest in learning about wine in terms of different cognitive, sensory and status pleasures. This chapter builds on emerging research that examines the pleasurable and embodied aspects of cultural practices by investigating how the sensory and cognitive interact to produce engagement with cultural objects and practices like wine appreciation. Chapter 5 examines how wine producers conceptualize the domestic market for their product in a context of emerging wine connoisseurship and nascent wine knowledge. I analyse how producers construct the “good wine consumer” through three key dimensions: 1) spending, 2) tasting, and 3) knowledge. This study contributes to better scholarly understanding of producers’ role in creating conventions of good taste, and of the contours of taste hierarchies in times of shifting cultural standards and cultural democratization trends, alongside continued patterns of distinction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.092

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.031
Scholarly communication0.0150.007
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace (University of Toronto)Same topicWine Industry and TourismFrench-language works237,207