MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W292327069

Predictors of Mexican Colonia Residents' Health Perceptions and Spirituality Level: A Pilot Study

2007· article· en· W292327069 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elliott Pauli, Linda B. Synovitz, Ralph Wood, Keri Diez, Ann K. Carruth

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œinternational electronic journal of health education · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpiritualityAttendanceGerontologyWorryReligiosityScale (ratio)MedicinePsychologyDemographyEnvironmental healthGeographyPolitical scienceSocial psychologyAnxietyPsychiatrySociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The purpose of this pilot study was to examine and identify factors predictive of health perceptions and spirituality levels of Mexican residents living in a border colonia. Sixty residents completed a survey. The instrument consisted of demographics items, a spiritual well-being scale containing two subscales, and a general health rating index (GHRI) containing five subscales used to measure health perceptions. Current health was rated better by those who reported having a physician. Health outlook was positively correlated to church attendance and to the number of individuals living in the home. Health worry/concern was positively correlated with age and inversely correlated with income. Correlations between general health perceptions and spiritual well-being yielded three significant relationships: current health, resistance to illness, and health outlook. Higher sense of spiritual well-being positively correlated (r = 0.61, p Key words: Health, Health Needs, Health Education, Colonia, Spirituality, Predictive Measures Introduction Background: Establishment of maquiladoras industry and colonias near the U.S. and Mexico Border The United States (U.S.) and Mexico border region is defined by the U.S. and Mexican government in the La Paz Agreement of 1983 as the 62 miles north and south of the border. (1) The area is approximately 2,000 miles long, stretching from San Ysidro, California to Brownsville, Texas. Comprised within the border area are four states in the United States and six states in Mexico. The forty-eight counties on the border within Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and California are among the poorest in the country, and the border area, including Mexico's side, ranks last in access to health care and last in per capita income. Not only are high rates of poverty and unemployment a concern, the region is medically underserved, creating pressing health and social conditions. On January 1, 1994, the National America Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) among the United States, Canada, and Mexico was implemented in order to make international trading of imports and exports less complicated. Before NAFTA, on the Mexican side of the border, there were only a few hundred maquiladoras (export-oriented factories). However, ten years later they numbered more than 3,800. (2) The maquiladoras industry has become Mexico's second-largest source of export earnings and primarily produce electronic equipment, clothing, plastics, furniture, appliances, and auto parts; however, the wages within several maquiladoras are relatively low, ranging from 50 cents to one dollar per day. (2,3) A large number of individuals throughout Mexico migrate north to the border, seeking employment opportunities. Unfortunately, the cost of living in border towns is often 30% higher than in southern Mexico, and many of the maquiladora employees are forced to live in shanty towns or colonias (neighborhoods) near the factory cities. (2) The development of colonias, defined as unincorporated subdivisions or pockets of shanty homes with extreme impoverished conditions, began in the late 1950's. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.153
GPT teacher head0.493
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œinternational electronic journal of health educationSame topicFood Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsFrench-language works237,207