Effect of BaFe12O19 Nanoparticles Addition on (Bi,Pb)-2223 Superconducting Phase
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this work is to investigate the effect of BaFe12O19 nanoparticles on the microstructure, phase formation and mechanical properties of (Bi,Pb)-2223 superconducting phase. Co-precipitation and solid-state reaction techniques were used to synthesize BaFe12O19 nanoparticles and (BaFe12O19)x(Bi,Pb)-2223 superconducting samples with , respectively. BaFe12O19 nanoparticles and (BaFe12O19)x(Bi,Pb)-2223 structures were performed using X-ray diffraction. The morphology of BaFe12O19 nanoparticles and (BaFe12O19)x(Bi,Pb)-2223 were observed by means of transmission electron microscope (TEM) and scanning electron microscope (SEM), respectively. The experimental results reveal the composition of Bi-2223 phase and traces of Bi-2212 as a secondary phase when compared to the undadded sample. Lattice parameters are not altered with BaFe12O19 addition which indicate that nanoparticles do not enter the host crystal of (Bi,Pb)-2223. Vickers microhardness Hv is measured as function of indentation load and time. It was found that microhardness has a non-linear trend with applied load and time. The experimental results were analyzed using different models. The analysis revealed that the HK model was more suitable than the other approaches in estimating the load independent hardness of the samples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it