MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2923791853 · doi:10.1063/1.5078739

Interfacial properties of hydrocarbon/water systems predicted by molecular dynamic simulations

2019· article· en· W2923791853 on OpenAlexafffund
Parisa Naeiji, Tom K. Woo, Saman Alavi, Farshad Varaminian, Ryo Ohmura

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsPropaneMethaneChemistryHydrocarbonSurface tensionMolecular dynamicsClathrate hydrateHydrostatic pressureThermodynamicsMonolayerTernary operationChemical physicsOrganic chemistryHydrateComputational chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The presence of small hydrocarbons is known to reduce the interfacial tension of the gas-water interface, and this phenomenon can affect the formation of the clathrate hydrates of these gases. In this work, the interfacial behavior of the pure methane-, ethane-, and propane-water, and the ternary 90:7:3 mol. % gas mixture of (methane + ethane + propane)-water were studied with molecular dynamics simulations. The interfacial tension, γ, and z-density profiles for the gases and water from simulations of the gas-water systems were determined at the temperatures of 275.15 and 298.15 K, and pressures up to 10 MPa for methane and up to near the experimental saturation pressures of ethane and propane. The goal is to accurately calculate the interfacial tension for the hydrocarbon/water systems and to analyze the molecular behaviors at the interfaces which lead to the observed trends. At the same hydrostatic gas phase pressure, propane, ethane, and methane reduce the gas-water interfacial tension in that order. The local density of the gas molecules at the interface is enhanced relative to the bulk gas, and it was determined that about 13%-20%, 33%-40%, and 54%-59% of the gas molecules in the simulation congregated at the interfaces for the CH4-, C2H6-, and C3H8-water systems, respectively, at the different simulated hydrostatic pressure ranges. For all gases in the pressure range studied, a complete monolayer of gas had not formed at the water interface. Furthermore, a dynamic equilibrium with fast exchange between molecules at the interface and in the gas phase was observed. For the gas mixture, deviations were observed between total calculated interfacial tension, γmix, and the “ideal mixture” value, ∑xiγi,pure, calculated from the interfacial tensions of the pure gases, where xi is the mole fraction of each substance in the simulation. Some possible implications of the results on the mechanism of clathrate hydrate formation are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicMethane Hydrates and Related PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207