Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
VenueNotices of the American Mathematical Society · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAir Force Institute of TechnologyUniversity of Colorado DenverUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityUniwersytet Marii Curie-SkłodowskiejUniversidad de MurciaUniversität WienÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneGeorge Fox UniversityUniversity of South AlabamaDivision of Mathematical SciencesKent State UniversitySaint Louis UniversityYoungstown State UniversityPacific Northwest National LaboratoryUniversità degli Studi di SalernoIdaho State UniversitySwarthmore CollegeCollege of CharlestonWest Virginia UniversityIowa State UniversityUniversity of South FloridaUniversity of AkronGeorgia State UniversityUniversity of Louisiana at LafayetteCoastal Carolina UniversityWellesley CollegeUniversity of CincinnatiPennsylvania State UniversityClemson UniversityGrand Valley State UniversityUniversity of DenverUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnUniversity of Notre DameSonoma State UniversityUniversity of WyomingLouisiana State UniversityUniversity of Southern CaliforniaUniversity of OklahomaUniversity of PittsburghUniversity of Central FloridaUniversity of WashingtonUniversity of California, IrvineUniversity of DaytonMichigan State UniversityAuburn UniversitySouth Dakota State UniversityWilliams CollegeBaylor UniversityUniversity of RochesterVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityUniversity of CanterburyCase Western Reserve UniversityUniversity of MinnesotaWichita State UniversityCity University of New YorkOhio State UniversityWake Forest UniversityUniversity of PennsylvaniaRice UniversityGeorgia Institute of TechnologySan Diego State UniversityUniversity of TorontoWashington and Lee UniversityTechnische Universität KaiserslauternPortland State UniversityTulane UniversityArizona State UniversityUniversity of OregonBrown UniversityUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonWestern Carolina UniversityOregon State UniversityUniversity of MiamiCalifornia State University, FresnoSiemens HealthineersEastern Kentucky UniversityU.S. Naval AcademyUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillWayne State UniversityUniversity of California, San DiegoUniversity of Southern MississippiUniversity of WaterlooBrigham Young UniversityRowan UniversityTemple UniversityPurdue UniversityOhio Wesleyan UniversityGeorgia Southern UniversityPitzer CollegeVanderbilt UniversityCentral Washington UniversityMassachusetts Institute of Technology
KeywordsMathematicsFinite differenceApplied mathematicsCalculus (dental)Mathematical analysisMedicine
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexAll of us, wherever we are, can celebrate together here in this issue of Notices the San Diego Joint Mathematics Meetings. Our lecture sampler includes for the first time the AMS-MAA-SIAM Hrabowski-Gates-Tapia-McBay Lecture, this year by Talithia Williams on the new PBS series NOVA Wonders. After the sampler, other articles describe modeling the heart, Drer's unfolding problem (which remains open), gerrymandering after the fall Supreme Court decision, a story for Congress about how geometry has advanced MRI, "My Father Andr Weil" (2018 is the 20th anniversary of his death), and a profile on Donald Knuth and native script by former
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.595
Threshold uncertainty score0.325
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
