MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2923897035 · doi:10.1080/07060661.2019.1592784

<i>Fusarium</i> and <i>Alternaria</i> mycotoxins present in Canadian wheat and durum harvest samples

2019· article· en· W2923897035 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Sheryl A. Tittlemier, Richard Blagden, Jason Chan, Don Gaba, Twylla McKendry, Kerri Pleskach, Mike Roscoe

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFusariumMycotoxinAlternariaAlternaria alternataBiologyHorticultureAgronomyVomitoxinBotanyZearalenone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objectives of this work were to investigate the presence of a variety of mycotoxins in Canadian wheat and durum and to characterize the relationship between concentrations of the Fusarium-produced deoxynivalenol (DON) and the presence of visible Fusarium damage. There is a lack of reported mycotoxin surveillance data for Canadian wheat and durum; this work addresses this information gap. Wheat and durum harvest samples from the 2010, 2011 and 2013–2016 growing seasons were analysed for mycotoxins produced by a variety of fungal species, including Fusarium graminearum and Alternaria alternata. The Alternaria-produced tentoxin was observed the most frequently; it was present in 90% of the samples analysed at concentrations up to 0.063 mg kg−1. Fusarium-produced DON and enniatins B and B1 were present in over 70% of samples analysed. The plant transformation product DON-3-glucoside was quantified in up to 30% of samples. There was variability in the presence of the various mycotoxins amongst years. In particular, for DON, the variability reflected the level of visible Fusarium damage noted in grain samples. The geographic source of samples also influenced DON concentrations, which decreased from eastern to western growing regions on the Prairies. Concentrations of DON varied from 0.066 to 0.895 mg kg−1 in south central Manitoba and <0.03 to 0.053 mg kg−1 in central Alberta. DON concentrations were significantly correlated (P < 0.001) with visible Fusarium damage in Canada Western Red Spring wheat for all four years investigated. For Canada Eastern Soft Red Winter wheat and Canada Western Amber Durum, there were significant correlations (P < 0.001) in three of the four years investigated for each grain class. The years with no significant correlation between DON and Fusarium damage occurred when the presence of Fusarium species other than the DON-producing F. graminearum were predominant. This work provides a picture of the presence, and absence, of a number of mycotoxins in Canadian wheat and durum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.636
Threshold uncertainty score0.661

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant PathologySame topicMycotoxins in Agriculture and FoodFrench-language works237,207