Efficacy and safety of guselkumab, administered with a novel patient-controlled injector (One-Press), for moderate-to-severe psoriasis: results from the phase 3 ORION study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: Guselkumab, an interleukin-23 antagonist, is approved for self-administration with the UltraSafe Plus™ syringe to treat moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis. We evaluated the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and acceptability of guselkumab administered using a novel patient-controlled injector (One-Press) in psoriasis patients.Materials and methods: This Phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (ORION, Clinicaltrials.gov identifier-NCT02905331) randomized adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis (4:1) to guselkumab 100 mg at Weeks 0/4/12/20/28 or placebo at Weeks 0/4/12 with crossover to guselkumab 100 mg at Weeks 16/20/28. Week 16 co-primary endpoints were the proportions of patients achieving Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) cleared/minimal (IGA 0/1) and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90% improvement (PASI90) responses. One-Press usability/acceptability was evaluated using the Self-Injection Assessment Questionnaire (SIAQ) and Patient-Controlled Injection Device Questionnaire. Final assessments occurred at Week 40.Results: At Week 16, significantly higher proportions of guselkumab-treated (N = 62) than placebo-treated (N = 16) patients achieved IGA 0/1 (80.6% vs. 0.0%, p < .001) and PASI90 (75.8% vs. 0.0%, p < .001) responses. Adverse events were comparable between treatments. SIAQ results demonstrated 99% (68/69) of patients were satisfied/very satisfied with One-Press at Week 28.Conclusions: Guselkumab administered using the One-Press patient-controlled injector was efficacious and well-tolerated in moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients, consistent with previously reported Phase-3 studies of guselkumab administered using UltraSafe Plus. One-Press was highly acceptable to patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".