2011 Scientific Session of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) San Antonio, Texas, USA, 30 March–2 April 2011 Poster Presentations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has increased in popularity as both a definitive and staged procedure for morbid obesity. Respectively, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common comorbid disease in bariatric patients. The effect of SG on GERD has not been well studied, thus the goal of this systematic literature review is to analyze the impact of SG on GERD. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database, Scopus, and the gray literature for the keywords ''sleeve gastrectomy,'' ''gastroesophageal reflux,'' and equivalents. Results: Sixteen articles were retrieved. Two articles analyzed GERD as a primary outcome, whereas fourteen included GERD as a secondary study outcome. Four studies showed an increase in GERD after SG. Seven studies found reduced GERD symptoms post-SG. Four studies included only the post-operative prevalence of GERD. One study did not include data on prevalence of GERD. Conclusion: The evidence on the impact of SG on GERD does not consolidate to a consensus. The studies show differing outcomes. Hence, dedicated studies that objectively evaluate GERD after SG are needed to more clearly define the effect of SG on GERD in bariatric patients
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".