Navigated interventions in the head and neck area: standardized assessment of a new handy field generator
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electromagnetic (EM) tracking enables localization of surgical instruments within the magnetic field emitted by an EM field generator (FG). Usually, the larger a FG is, the larger its tracking volume is. However, the company NDI (Northern Digital Inc., Waterloo, ON, Canada) recently introduced the Planar 10-11 FG, which combines a compact construction (97mm x 112mm x 31mm) with a relatively large, cylindrical tracking volume (diameter: 340mm, height: 340mm). Using the standardized assessment protocol of Hummel et al., the FG was tested with regard to its tracking accuracy and to its robustness with respect to external sources of disturbance. The mean positional error (5cm distance metric according to Hummel protocol) was 0.59mm, with a mean jitter of 0.26mm in the standard setup. The mean orientational error was found to be 0.10°. The highest positional error (4.82mm) due to metallic sources of disturbance was caused by the steel SST 303. In contrast, steel SST 416 caused the lowest positional error (0.10mm). Overall, the Planar 10-11 FG tends to achieve better tracking accuracy results compared to other NDI FGs. Due to its compact construction and portability, the FG could contribute to increased clinical use of EM tracking systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".