MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2924502206 · doi:10.1117/12.2518295

Real time label-free monitoring of plasmonic polymerase chain reaction products

2019· article· en· W2924502206 on OpenAlexaff
Gideon Uchehara, Andrew G. Kirk, Mark Trifiro, Miltiadis Paliouras, Padideh Mohammadyousef

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiosensors and Analytical Detection
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolymerase chain reactionComputer scienceReplicateNanotechnologyComputational biologyMaterials scienceBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The high mortality rate in developing countries stemming from poverty and diseases, and the pressure on healthcare budgets in developed countries have evoked a major concern in healthcare delivery. The need for less costly and patient-centered healthcare delivery brings point-of-care testing (PoCT) to the fore. PoCT devices help to eliminate the overheads associated with centralized bench-top laboratory instruments. Although, handheld devices such as Glucose biosensor strip exist, small handheld PoCT devices for molecular techniques such as Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) used to provide infectious disease testing are new and emerging.Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) is a biological technique used to amplify DNA. PCR makes it possible to replicate DNA and generate millions of copies from a single strand of DNA. This finds applications in the medical field to identify and detect infectious diseases. PCR is also a very important component of every laboratory involved in molecular biology experimentation. Conventional PCR equipment is expensive and require a significant amount of personnel time and space to setup and run in the laboratory. Another critical aspect of PCR systems is the need to detect amplified products, but this ability is lacking in most conventional PCR systems. Given this background, the aim of this work is to demonstrate a simple, cheap, effective and patient-centered PCR systems to mediate the shortcomings of conventional PCR machines especially as it concerns the detection of amplified PCR products.Different methods for the detection of PCR products are described. Some of them are relatively insensitive and nonspecific while others are very sensitive and highly specific. The merits and demerits of each method are also outlined.In this work, I have exploited the phase shift between the temperature and transmission output during PCR cycle to demonstrate a low cost and easy label-free plasmonic photodetection of PCR products using a simple probe laser. This method makes it possible to distinguish between negative and positive PCRs, and it can detect PCR product with starting copy number as low as 10,000 genome copies per microliter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.315

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBiosensors and Analytical DetectionFrench-language works237,207