Floral visits of the wild bee, <i>Lithurgus atratus</i>, impact yield and seed germinability of okra, <i>Abelmoschus esculentus</i>, in Sri Lanka
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bee-pollinated crops in landscapes with a low abundance of bees suffer from insufficient pollination. The present study investigates the effect of wild bee pollination on fruit and seed production in okra, Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench. The study was conducted in a home garden, where an okra field was established for three pollination trials each to include 40 okra plants. For each trial, three sets of 25 flower buds were selected and tagged. One set was covered to deter bees, another set was kept open to enable bee visits and the other set was cross-pollinated by hand. Of the two species of bees, Tetragonula iridipennis (Smith) visited flowers for nectar while Lithurgus atratus Smith collected and carried pollen grains. The period of stigma receptivity and pollen availability coincided with the highest activity of L. atratus from 10.00 a.m. to 12.20 p.m. Bee-pollinated flowers had significantly enhanced okra pod length and diameter, seed number and seed germinability compared to the trial with flowers covered to deter bees. Hand pollinated flowers also produced significantly longer pods and a higher number of seeds with higher germinability. Although there was no significant difference in pod length and diameter and seed number between hand pollination trial and bee-pollinated trial, germinability of bee-pollinated seeds was significantly higher. Present study highlights the importance of the wild bee, L. atratus to enhance pod size, seed number and seed germinability in okra in Kurunegala, Sri Lanka.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".