Somatic expansion of the <i>C9orf72</i> hexanucleotide repeat does not occur in ALS spinal cord tissues
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To test for somatic C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion (HRE) and hexanucleotide repeat length instability in the spinal cord of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) cases. Methods Whole and partial spinal cords of 19 ALS cases were dissected into transversal sections (5 mm thick). The presence of C9orf72 HRE was tested in each independent section using RepeatPrimed PCR and amplicon-size genotyping. Index measures for the testing of mosaicism were obtained through serial dilutions of genomic DNA from an individual carrying a germline C9orf72 HRE in the genomic DNA of an individual without a C9orf72 HRE. Results None of the sections examined supported the presence of a subpopulation of cells with a C9orf72 HRE. Moreover, the C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat lengths measured were identical across all the spinal cord sections of each individual patient. Conclusions We did not observe somatic instability of the C9orf72 HRE in disease relevant tissues of ALS cases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".