MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2924954496 · doi:10.2523/iptc-19526-ms

Successful Application of Specialized High-Performance Water Based Drilling Fluid to Drill a TAR Section

2019· article· en· W2924954496 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Abdullah Abahussain, Rafael Pino, Hesham El-Dakroury, Ajay Addagalla

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Petroleum Technology Conference · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDrilling fluidDrillingPetroleum engineeringGeologyDrill cuttingsDrillOil sandsDragAsphaltLost circulationGeotechnical engineeringMaterials scienceEngineeringMechanical engineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drilling a TAR formation has never been easy due to the sticky nature of the material. TAR sands are sandstone formations saturated with bitumen or heavy oil and are soft and poorly consolidated. The sandstone is usually water-wet in the formation with the sand grains held together mainly by the bitumen. Weathering and biological process results in loss of the lighter oil fractions, leaving behind the very viscous, solid or semi-solid heavy residues. Bitumen deposits are found in more than 70 countries globally, with large outcrops in Venezuela and Canada. Drilling TAR sections with conventional drilling fluid systems, either water-based or oil-based, has proven ineffective. Some factors that must be considered are wellbore enlargement, accretion, screen blinding, erratic torque and drag, larger cuttings and temperature conditions. TAR tends to be mostly hydrocarbon-based and it swells, softens or dissolves in oils or in synthetic base-fluids that the industry uses for oil Based Muds (OBM) or Synthetic Based Muds (SBM). Drilling with OBM or SBM tends to lower the mechanical strength of the TAR, exacerbating any tendency to mobilize into the wellbore. A conventional water-based mud with basic inhibition and minimal reduction in pore pressure transmission may not be helpful in mitigating the challenges associated with wellbore stability, accretion, torque and drag complications. A High-Performance Water Based Mud (HPWBM) was designed to drill these types of complicated intervals, nearly matching the drilling performance of oil-based mud (OBM) and delivering a gauge hole. This paper presents a successful drilling through a TAR section using a HPWBM after failures using OBM. The previous attempts were carefully studied to identify the challenges associated during drilling and considered while designing this HPWBM. The TAR interval was successfully drilled without any drilling fluid related Non-Productive Time and completion set on bottom without any problems. This approach for drilling fluid chemistry provides an environmentally sound replacement for the current drilling fluids to drill TAR sections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.248
Threshold uncertainty score0.660

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Petroleum Technology ConferenceSame topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207