Promoting smoking cessation among health professionals - the educational role of the Tobacco Control Section of The Romanian Society of Pulmonologists
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The tabacology section was set up in 2007 at the second National Conference on Tobacco, entitled "Health or Tobacco", held in Cluj, between May 10-12 2007, with the wish to help smokers, and not just only them. The objectives of this department were to attract as many pneumologists as possible to the smoking cessation cabinet, but also to develop educational materials for smokers (brochures, flyers, video clips, DVDs, etc.) to be distributed in specialized smoking cessation services. Another challenge was the continuation of the work that started with the introduction of the concept of smoking cessation in both the university and postgraduate medical curricula. Also, the activity of the section was devoted mainly to the elaboration of the first Romanian guide for granting specialized smoking cessation assistance - the GREFA guide, published in 2008, updated in 2010. Another objective was the continuation of already initiated partnerships with other professional societies (Romanian Society of Cardiology, Romanian Society of Internal Medicine, etc.) and the development of new collaborations in the field of assistance to smokers with still unaddressed professional categories such as psychologists, psychiatrists, oncologists, nurses, obstetricians, occupational medicine specialists, etc., as well as the organization of scientific and continuing medical education in the field of local and national conferences of the Romanian Society of Pulmonologists (RSP) or other medical societies of various specialties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".