Postura e Método Realista em Gaibéus e Trabalhadores
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pretende-se, no presente trabalho, investigar a postura e o método realista em Gaibéus, de Alves Redol e na fotografia de Sebastião Salgado. A adesão aoprojeto estético neorrealista, entre as décadas 30 e 50 do século XX, aliou a representação das camadas populares, observada já em narrativas do final do séculoXIX, como Os miseráveis, de Vitor Hugo (1862), e Germinal, de Émile Zola (1885), à busca pela conscientização dessas classes. Nesse sentido, A estética neorrealista se configura como um novo movimento de captação e encenação da realidade, concebendo o homem como um agente de mudança na sociedade em que ele vive.Palavras-chave: Literatura e Fotografia, Realismo, Alves Redol, Sebastião Salgado. ____________________________ We intended, in this work, to investigate the attitude and realistic method in Alves Redol’s Gaibéus and in Sebastião Salgado’s photography. Joining the neorealist aesthetic project, between 30 and 50 decades of the twentieth century, combined the representation of the lower classes, as observed in narratives of the late nineteenth century as Les Misérables, by Victor Hugo (1862) and Germinal, Emile Zola (1885), the quest for awareness of these classes. In this sense, the neorealist aesthetic is configured as a new motion capture and staging of reality, conceiving man as an agent of change in the society in which he lives.Keywords: Literature and Photography, Realism, Alves Redol, Sebastião Salgado.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".