Maternal care activates the ventral tegmental area but not dopaminergic cells in the rat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ventral tegmental area (VTA), together with the preoptic area, is part of a neural circuit necessary for the expression of maternal behaviour (MB); destruction of either area disrupts MB in postpartum rats. Central to the proposal of VTA activation are dopaminergic cells, for which the cell bodies lie in the VTA and project to forebrain structures. This mesolimbic system is a motivational circuit involved in rewarding behaviours such as sex and MB. Despite their recognised importance, surprisingly, unlike the preoptic area, there are no anatomical descriptions of the pattern of VTA activation or of the dopaminergic cell activation, specifically in relation to MB in the rat. In the present study, we explore the possible activation (as indicated by Fos protein via immunohistochemistry) of the anterior and medial portions of the VTA and in the dopaminergic cells in these regions, as well as in the medial preoptic area, in lactating rats, at postpartum day 7 (after a 12-hour mother/pups separation), and in dioestrous females. After 12 hours, mothers were perfused at that moment or after a 90 minutes of interaction, or not, with their pups. We found a strong significant Fos induction in both the preoptic area and in the anterior portion of VTA in dams that interacted with their pups. The number of dopaminergic cells that coexpressed Fos did not differ across groups. Additionally, we determined Fos and GABA colocalisation in the anterior part of the VTA and found dense GABAergic processes, possibly varicosities, in the area of increased Fos expression. The results of the present study support a proposed GABAergic pathway from medial preoptic area to VTA cells, critical for the expression of MB. Future experiments are warranted to explore the neurochemical identity of the Fos and no-Fos expressing cells that are recipients of GABAergic processes in the VTA, aiming to better understand the neural circuitry of the VTA in relation to MB.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".