MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2925277087 · doi:10.1148/radiol.2019182041

Attenuation Changes in ASPECTS Regions: A Surrogate for CT Perfusion–based Ischemic Core in Acute Ischemic Stroke

2019· article· en· W2925277087 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Paul Reidler, Kolja M. Thierfelder, Lukas T. Rotkopf, Matthias P. Fabritius, Daniel Puhr‐Westerheide, Franziska Dorn, Nils D. Forkert, André Kemmling, Wolfgang G. Kunz

Bibliographic record

VenueRadiology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Institutes of HealthNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsMedicineIschemic strokePerfusionCardiologyPerfusion scanningAcute strokeStroke (engine)Internal medicineCore (optical fiber)IschemiaRadiologyTissue plasminogen activator

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Recent studies have proven the effectiveness of thrombectomy up to 24 hours after stroke onset for patients with specific criteria at advanced CT or MRI. Clinical implementation of treatment in this extended time window remains a challenge, as many stroke centers do not routinely use advanced imaging. Purpose To determine whether automated cerebral x-ray attenuation measurements at noncontrast CT provide information on the presence of CT perfusion–defined ischemic core as applied in late time windows for thrombectomy. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, patients with middle cerebral artery stroke due to proximal occlusion from 2009 to 2017 were included. All patients underwent noncontrast CT and CT perfusion. Automated software was used to calculate relative Hounsfield unit (rHU) values for Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) regions on noncontrast CT images as the ratio of x-ray attenuation between ischemic versus non-ischemic hemispheres. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic performance of rHU and composite rHU-ASPECTS, a score incorporating rHU from all regions, were analyzed for the classification of regional ischemic core and late time window thrombectomy criteria at CT perfusion. Results Data in a total of 200 patients were evaluated (105 women [mean age, 74 years ± 14 {standard deviation}] and 95 men [mean age, 76 years ± 14]). There were 121 patients in the validation cohort and 79 patients in the independent test cohort. Compared among all examined regions, rHU values yielded the best classification of ischemic core for the caudate nucleus, the lentiform nucleus, and the insula (with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUCs] ranging from 0.70 to 0.77; P < .001 for each). The composite rHU-ASPECTS score allowed classification of CT perfusion imaging selection criteria of ischemic core sizes of less than 70 mL and target mismatch of greater than 1.8 with AUCs of 0.80 (P = .001; 75% sensitivity and 83% specificity) in the test cohort and 0.74 (P < .001; 58% sensitivity and 82% specificity) in the validation cohort. Conclusion Noncontrast CT x-ray attenuation measurements identify Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score regions classified as ischemic core at CT perfusion. This approach may serve as a selection criteria surrogate for thrombectomy in late time windows. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.431
Threshold uncertainty score0.918

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRadiologySame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207