MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2925278720 · doi:10.18332/tpc/105594

The role of urologists in smoking cessation: what they can do for urological cancer patients

2019· article· en· W2925278720 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Krzysztof Przewoźniak, Roman Sosnowski

Bibliographic record

VenueTobacco Prevention & Cessation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersThird Health ProgrammeUniversity of WaterlooCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchEuropean Commission
KeywordsMedicineSmoking cessationCancerFamily medicineOncologyInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Tobacco use is the most preventable cause of death, including death from cancer. Smoking is a well-known risk factor for various cancers, including bladder cancer (BCa). BCa is the most common malignancy of the urinary tract, the seventh most common cancer in men worldwide, and eighth most frequent cause of cancer-specific mortality in Europe. Smoking has been well documented as a risk factor for BCa,incidence and the factor that worsens BCa treatment outcomes and prognosis. Study Aim To evaluate the need and a potential of smoking cessation interventions that urologists can perform in their medical practice for patients with cancer of urinary or urogenital tract. Methods A search of recent literature was conducted using the MEDLINE data base and the Internet, as well as resources from well- known health, cancer and tobacco control organizations. Results Smoking cessation is proved to be one of the most effective primary and secondary preventive methods in cancer patients, however, in medical practice is still used in limited extent. Among cancer patients is mostly advised to those with lung, laryngeal or oral cancer. National health surveys show that even general practitioners (GPs) do not advise and assist their patients in quitting smoking on regular basis (such advice is usually provided to only 40-50% of smoking patients). Urologists tend to do it in medical practice much less often than GPs. A large study that examined the practice patterns of American urologists, including their smoking cessation assistance for patients with BCa, showed that over half of urologists never discussed smoking cessation and only one of five always had a talk with his BCa patient on smoking cessation. It mainly resulted from big loopholes in their knowledge and beliefs on smoking as serious risk factor in cancer of urinary tract and lack of education and professional training in smoking cessation. This paper discusses what can be done to involve urologists in smoking cessation counselling and proposes a new 5As-based scheme of brief intervention tailored to the needs of BCa cancer patients. Conclusions Urologists who treat patients with disease of urinary or urogenital tract, patients at the risk of cancer or diagnosed cancer patients may play an essential role in helping their patients cease smoking. Their cessation efforts should be focused on cancer patient-tailored brief intervention and collaboration with specialized smoking cessation resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.034
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.034
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.007
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0050.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTobacco Prevention & CessationSame topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207