Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article présente une vue synthétique de l’histoire de « l’écrivain catholique » au Québec depuis le xixe siècle. Trois périodes se dégagent. Une première couvre les quarante premières années du xxe siècle, est marquée par la domination de clercs universitaires comme Camille Roy ou Lionel Groulx qui défendent un nationalisme régionaliste « canadien-français ». La deuxième voit s’affirmer, durant et autour de la Deuxième Guerre mondiale, des laïques qui promeuvent une esthétique de l’intériorité inspirée par l’exemple des « écrivains catholiques français » comme Claudel, Bernanos ou Mauriac. La troisième apparaît avec la Révolution tranquille des années 1960 où les « écrivains québécois » abandonnent le catholicisme comme identité caractéristique de leur engagement littéraire.The article presents a synthetic view of the history of the "Catholic writer" in Quebec since the 19th century. Three periods emerge. A first covers the first forty years of the twentieth century, is marked by the domination of university clerics like Camille Roy or Lionel Groulx who defend a regionalist nationalism "French-Canadian". The second is witnessed during and around the Second World War by laypeople who promote an aesthetic of interiority inspired by the example of "French Catholic writers" such as Claudel, Bernanos or Mauriac. The third appears with the Quiet Revolution of the 1960s when "Quebec writers" abandon Catholicism as a characteristic identity of their literary commitment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".