MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2925734326 · doi:10.1242/dev.170498

Role of Cdx factors in early mesodermal fate decisions

2019· article· en· W2925734326 on OpenAlexafffund
Tanya Foley, Bradley Hess, Joanne G.A. Savory, Randy Ringuette, David Lohnes

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopment · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCongenital heart defects research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersMcGill UniversityCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsBiologyMesodermZebrafishTranscription factorChromatinCell biologyGeneticsCell fate determinationEctopic expressionRegulation of gene expressionEpigeneticsGeneEmbryonic stem cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Murine cardiac and hematopoietic progenitors are derived from Mesp1+ mesoderm. Cdx function impacts both yolk sac hematopoiesis and cardiogenesis in zebrafish, suggesting that Cdx family members regulate early mesoderm cell fate decisions. We found that Cdx2 occupies a number of transcription factor loci during embryogenesis, including key regulators of both cardiac and blood development, and that Cdx function is required for normal expression of the cardiogenic transcription factors Nkx2-5 and Tbx5. Furthermore, Cdx and Brg1, an ATPase subunit of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex, co-occupy a number of loci, suggesting that Cdx family members regulate target gene expression through alterations in chromatin architecture. Consistent with this, we demonstrate loss of Brg1 occupancy and altered chromatin structure at several cardiogenic genes in Cdx-null mutants. Finally, we provide evidence for an onset of Cdx2 expression at E6.5 coinciding with egression of cardiac progenitors from the primitive streak. Together, these findings suggest that Cdx functions in multi-potential mesoderm to direct early cell fate decisions through transcriptional regulation of several novel target genes, and provide further insight into a potential epigenetic mechanism by which Cdx influences target gene expression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.157
Threshold uncertainty score0.302

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevelopmentSame topicCongenital heart defects researchFrench-language works237,207