SNPs associated with <i>HHIP</i> expression have differential effects on lung function in males and females
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Adult lung function is highly heritable and 279 genetic loci were recently reported as associated with spirometry-based measures of lung function. Though lung development and function differ between males and females throughout life, there has been no genome-wide study to identify genetic variants with differential effects on lung function in males and females. Here, we present the first genome-wide genotype-by-sex interaction study on four lung function traits in 303,612 participants from the UK Biobank. We detected five SNPs showing genome-wide significant (P<5 × 10 −8 ) interactions with sex on lung function, as well as 21 suggestively significant interactions (P<1 × 10 −6 ). The strongest sex interaction signal came from rs7697189 at 4:145436894 on forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1 ) (P = 3.15 × 10 −15 ), and was replicated (P = 0.016) in 75,696 individuals in the SpiroMeta consortium. Sex-stratified analyses demonstrated that the minor (C) allele of rs7697189 increased lung function to a greater extent in males than females (untransformed FEV 1 β = 0.028 [SE 0.0022] litres in males vs β = 0.009 [SE 0.0014] litres in females), and this effect was not accounted for by differential effects on height, smoking or age at puberty. This SNP resides upstream of the gene encoding hedgehog-interacting protein ( HHIP ) and has previously been reported for association with lung function and HHIP expression in lung tissue. In our analyses, while HHIP expression in lung tissue was significantly different between the sexes with females having higher expression (most significant probeset P=6.90 × 10 −6 ) after adjusting for age and smoking, rs7697189 did not demonstrate sex differential effects on expression. Establishing the mechanism by which HHIP SNPs have different effects on lung function in males and females will be important for our understanding of lung health and diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), in both sexes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".