MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2926227414 · doi:10.1002/qj.3543

Accelerating radiative transfer calculations for high‐resolution atmospheric models

2019· article· en· W2926227414 on OpenAlexafffund
Howard W. Barker, Jiangnan Li

Bibliographic record

VenueQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric aerosols and clouds
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
FundersEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
KeywordsRadiative transferRadiative fluxColumn (typography)Atmospheric radiative transfer codesMeteorologyEnvironmental sciencePhysicsMathematicsGeometryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study presents a method for calculating all‐sky, broadband radiative fluxes for high‐resolution atmospheric model domains, such as limited‐area numerical weather prediction models and Cloud System‐Resolving Models, that have many columns (i.e. ≫ 105). The aim is to replace the Independent Column Approximation (ICA) which applies 1D radiative transfer models (RTMs) to all columns; but usually after skipping many dynamical time steps due to the ICA's computational burden. The proposed method, referred to as Partitioned Gauss–Legendre Quadrature (PGLQ), begins by partitioning a domain into sub‐domains. This study is concerned just with cloudy columns so partitioning was done according to cloud‐top altitudes. Then, for each sub‐domain, sort columns from smallest to largest cloud water path , assign each column a sequence number, identify nG GLQ points, and apply 1D RTMs to the nG columns with resulting flux profiles assigned to nearby columns in the sorted sequence. Last, reposition columns back to the full domain. Marine boundary‐layer and deep convective cloud fields were used to assess PGLQ. For ratios of RTM calculations between ICA and PGLQ of fRT = /(nG · )−1 ∈ [103, 104], MBEs and RMSEs for net short‐wave (SW) surface fluxes scale close to (nG · )−1, RMSEs being typically ∼200× smaller than domain‐average . Structure function analyses of indicate that PGLQ errors resemble white noise. Long‐wave (LW) fluxes perform less well due to sorting on but seem likely to be acceptable, RMSEs being ∼5–10× smaller than domain‐average . All MBEs are typically <±0.5 W/m2. Estimates of radiative heating rate profiles are unbiased, and while noisy at small scales, they are portrayed well at scales larger than typical individual clouds. Overall speed‐up of PGLQ relative to ICA, for serial computation as consider here, is expected to be >300×; likely to be comparable to parallel computation. This should allow application of RTMs at every dynamical time step.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological SocietySame topicAtmospheric aerosols and cloudsFrench-language works237,207