MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2926907761 · doi:10.1101/602011

Solid State High Throughput Screening Microscopy

2019· preprint· en· W2926907761 on OpenAlexafffund
M. S. Ashraf, Sharika Mohanan, BLH Sim, Angela Tam, Denis Brousseau, Simon Thibault, Alexander D. Corbett, Gil Bub

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalMcGill University
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsThroughputFrame rateCardinal pointSample (material)Field of viewArtificial intelligenceComputer visionComputer scienceOpticsDepth of fieldPoint (geometry)MicroscopePhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We introduce a solid state high throughput screening (ssHTS) imaging modality that uses a novel Newtonian telescope design to image multiple spatially separated samples without moving parts or robotics. Conventional high-throughput imaging modalities either require movement of the sample to the focal plane of the imaging system 1–3 or movement of the imaging system itself 4,5 , or use a wide-field approach to capture several samples in one frame. Schemes which move the sample or the imaging system can be mechanically complex and are inherently slow, while wide-field imaging systems have poor light collection efficiency and resolution compared to systems that image a single sample at a given time point. Our proposed ssHTS system uses a large parabolic reflector and an imaging lenses positioned at their focal distances above each sample. A fast LED array sequentially illuminate samples to generate images that are captured with a single camera placed at the focal point of the reflector. This optical configuration allows each sample to completely fill a sensors field of view. Since each LED illuminates a single sample and LED switch times are very fast, images from spatially separated samples can be captured at rates limited only by the camera’s frame rate. The system is demonstrated by imaging cardiac monolayer and Caenorhabditis elegans ( C. elegans ) preparations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207