MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2927002126 · doi:10.1109/tap.2019.2907610

Low-Profile Artificial Grid Dielectric Resonator Antenna Arrays for mm-Wave Applications

2019· article· en· W2927002126 on OpenAlexafffund
Waqas Mazhar, David M. Klymyshyn, Garth Wells, Aqeel A. Qureshi, Michael Jacobs, Sven Achenbach

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)University of Saskatchewan
FundersNational Research Council CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for InnovationCanadian Light Source
KeywordsMaterials scienceDielectric resonator antennaWidebandResonatorAntenna (radio)OptoelectronicsBall grid arrayWaveguideOpticsTelecommunicationsComputer sciencePhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wideband artificial grid dielectric resonator antenna (GDRA) arrays at 32 GHz for mm-wave applications are presented. The antenna array comprised a GDRA layer and a substrate-integrated waveguide feeding layer. The GDRA array layer is built by embedding small rectangular metal grid structures in low-permittivity dielectric polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) using deep X-ray lithography (DXRL) and electroforming. The rectangular metallic inclusions significantly increase the effective permittivity of the base material up to 17 by creating high electric flux density regions inside. Low-loss substrate-integrated waveguide (SIW) feeding with longitudinal slots is utilized to excite the GDRA array layer. A 200 μm-thin perforated layer of PMMA is applied between the rectangular grid structures and the SIW feedlines to avoid shorting the metal inclusions to the excitation slots while improving broadband energy coupling to the GDRA layer. The size of the single GDRA array element is only 2.7 mm × 2.7 mm × 0.5 mm (0.29λ <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">o</sub> ×0.29λ <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">o</sub> ×0.05λ <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">o</sub> ). Four-element (1×4) and eight-element (1 × 8) GDRA arrays have been fabricated and measured. A measured impedance bandwidth of 6 GHz with a broadside peak gain of 12 dBi and 76% measured radiation efficiency is obtained at 32 GHz for the 1 × 8 GDRA array.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.963
Threshold uncertainty score0.735

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and PropagationSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207