MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2927289114 · doi:10.1103/physreve.99.042101

Diffusion in a bistable system: The eigenvalue spectrum of the Fokker-Planck operator and Kramers' reaction rate theory

2019· article· en· W2927289114 on OpenAlexaff
Yahui Zhan, Bernie D. Shizgal

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. E · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
Topicstochastic dynamics and bifurcation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFokker–Planck equationEigenfunctionEigenvalues and eigenvectorsOperator (biology)PhysicsDiffusionMathematical analysisBistabilitySpectrum (functional analysis)Quantum mechanicsMathematicsDifferential equation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The time-dependent solution of the Fokker-Planck equation with bistable potentials is considered in terms of the eigenfunctions and eigenvalues of the linear Fokker-Planck operator. The Fokker-Planck equation is the high friction limit of the corresponding Kramers' equation. Two different potentials are considered defined with a constant diffusion coefficient, ε, and position-dependent drift coefficients. The smallest nonzero eigenvalue of the Fokker-Planck operator, λ_{1}, provides the long-time rate coefficient for the transformation of the different species in the two stable states. A novel pseudospectral method with nonclassical polynomials is applied to this class of systems. The convergence of the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of the Fokker-Planck operator versus the number of basis functions is studied and compared with previous results. The results are consistent with Kramers' theory, and a linear relationship between lnλ_{1} and 1/ε for sufficiently small ε values is verified. A comparison with analytic approximations to λ_{1} is provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.573
Threshold uncertainty score0.205

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. ESame topicstochastic dynamics and bifurcationFrench-language works237,207