MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2927675443 · doi:10.1089/gtmb.2018.0276

Association Between the <i>IL-10-1082G/A</i> , <i>IL-10-592A/C</i> , and <i>IL-10-819G/A</i> Polymorphisms and Atopic Dermatitis Susceptibility: A Meta-Analysis

2019· review· en· W2927675443 on OpenAlex
Jian Zhao, Zeyu Chen, Linfeng Li

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGenetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatology and Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOdds ratioMeta-analysisCochrane LibraryAtopic dermatitisConfidence intervalMedicineInternal medicineImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims: The aim of this study was to summarize the currently available evidence on the associations between the IL-10-1082G/A, IL-10-592A/C, and IL-10-819G/A polymorphisms and susceptibility to atopic dermatitis (AD). Materials and Methods: Five electronic databases including PubMed, the Web of Science, Excerpta Medica dataBASE, the Cochrane Library, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched for potential studies. Studies illustrating the association of the IL-10-1082G/A, IL-10-592A/C, and IL-10-819G/A polymorphisms and AD susceptibility were included in this meta-analysis. For a study to be included, it had to have been published before September 20, 2018. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. Summary odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to evaluate potential associations under five genetic models. Results: A total of 15 case–control studies comprising of 1647 AD patients and 2031 controls were included in this meta-analysis. Their methodological qualities were generally high. We confirmed an association between the IL-10-819G/A polymorphism and AD, but there was an insignificant association identified between the IL-10-1082G/A and the IL-10-592A/C polymorphisms and AD when all ethnic groups were considered together. The subgroup analyses revealed some ethnic-specific effects. For the IL-10-819G/A polymorphism, individuals with the GG-genotype seemed to have an increased risk of AD among Caucasian populations, but less so in the Asian populations. However, for the IL-10-1082G/A polymorphism, the GG-genotype carriers seemed to be more susceptible to AD in the Asian populations than in the Caucasian populations. Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that the IL-10-819G/A polymorphism seems to be associated with increased risk of AD among Caucasian populations, and that the IL-10-1082G/A polymorphism seems to be correlated with AD among Asian populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.526
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it