MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2927960441 · doi:10.1161/hcq.12.suppl_1.191

Abstract 191: BRAVE: Blood Pressure and Vascular Health Around Menopause

2019· article· en· W2927960441 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Ahmer Wali, Valeria Raparelli, Louise Pilote

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMenopauseBlood pressureArterial stiffnessPulse wave velocityInternal medicinePulse pressureCardiologyRisk factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Post-menopausal women are more likely to have uncontrolled hypertension and are at higher risk of cardiovascular disease compared with age-matched men. Blood pressure variability (BPV) has recently emerged as a predictor of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. It is unknown if there is a relationship between BPV and menopause and whether BPV can predict vascular health in perimenopausal women. Methods: BRAVE (Blood pRessure And Vascular hEalth around menopause) is an observational study recruiting perimenopausal healthy women, aimed at studying the relationship between BPV, the menopause transition and vascular health. A 24-hour blood pressure (BP) measurement [including 24-hour coefficient of variation, night dipping and maximum BP] was used to define the BPV. Menopausal status and cardiovascular risk factors were collected through questionnaires. Arterial stiffness, as a marker of vascular health status, was measured using pulse wave velocity. Multivariable models were performed to identify factors associated with BPV as well as those associated with arterial stiffness in perimenopausal women. Results: Fifty healthy women (mean age 52.9 ± 4.0, 62% post-menopausal) were recruited. There was a low prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, except physical inactivity (60%). In around 40% of patients, we observed an abnormal pattern of BPV. However, all measures of BPV were similar between peri and post menopausal women. In the multivariable analysis, BMI was the only factor associated independently with maximum overnight BP (ß=1.95, p<0.0001) and maximum daytime BP (ß=2.46, p=0.008). Furthermore, maximum overnight BP was found to significantly associated with the arterial stiffness measurement (ß=0.035, p=0.048) after adjusting for confounders, including mean BP and cardiovascular risk factors. Conclusion: An abnormal pattern of BPV is common in perimenopausal women with normal office BP measurement. Maximum overnight BP provides useful information on vascular health beyond mean blood pressure in this population. BPV measurements in normotensive perimenopausal women may therefore have additional clinical value in stratifying their cardiovascular risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation Cardiovascular Quality and OutcomesSame topicCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207