Recording Village Life: A Coptic Scribe in Early Islamic EgyptBy Jennifer A. Cromwell
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jennifer Cromwell has written an impressive volume on Aristophanes son of Johannes, an eighth-century Egyptian scribe living in the famed village of Jeme (Djeme) in western Thebes, Upper Egypt. It is a detailed monograph brimming with new insights and methodological sophistication, setting a new benchmark for studies focused on the important village of Jeme, and the documentation from western Thebes more generally. The book is destined to take its place among the shortlist of fundamental studies of that community and region, alongside the works of A. A. Schiller (Ten Coptic Legal Texts, 1932; ‘A Family Archive’, 1950), and T. G. Wilfong (Women of Jeme, 2002). Jeme was a bustling village with a socio-economically stratified population within close proximity to three sizeable monasteries. Both the location of the village and the period from which the bulk of its documentation survives—late seventh to the late eighth century—render studies of Jeme of key importance to papyrologists and scholars focused on Egypt, the early Islamic era, and the Middle Ages. Cromwell approaches Jeme through the lens of Aristophanes’s 142-document dossier (though, the reverse is also true): 120 texts are positively identified through his signature, and an additional twenty-two through other criteria. Most of the documents (106) are short tax receipts on ostraca, though the remainder, while often incomplete, are lengthier and address a range of issues. The bulk of the dossier dates to the second quarter of the eighth century, a period of significant change in Egypt and the Caliphate more generally. (On the dossier, see ch. 2, the tables on pp. 39 and 58, and Appendices I and III.A; Appendix II provides editions of ten ostraca from the dossier.)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".