Exhibiting War: The Great War, Museums, and Memory in Britain, Canada, and Australia, by Jennifer Wellington
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jennifer Wellington’s study of the presentation of the First World War through exhibitions of artefacts and visual images in Australia, Britain and Canada provides a fascinating insight into the home fronts of all three nations. Through the examination of a wide range of primary sources from the national (and other) archives of her three chosen examples, and insightful interpretation, synthesising and interweaving of other studies, she deepens considerably our growing understanding of the complex relationships between the state and citizens during the course of the conflict. Over recent years, the history of the home front has become much more focused on the concept of self-mobilisation and the degree to which people worked towards the agenda of the state under relatively little direct, centralised authority. By the same token, it is acknowledged that, by the end of 1916, war’s realities had made themselves fully felt, requiring the combatant states to enter a process of remobilisation in the second half of the conflict. Wellington’s work reveals the variety of those approaches used to remobilise society, while also highlighting the continuing importance of agencies and organisations that were linked to central government by dotted lines, rather than under its direct control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".