MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2928316320 · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.9b00648

Peptide-Mediated Electrochemical Steric Hindrance Assay for One-Step Detection of HIV Antibodies

2019· article· en· W2928316320 on OpenAlexafffund
Sahar Sadat Mahshid, Sara Mahshid, Alexis Vallée‐Bélisle, Shana O. Kelley

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Chemistry · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMcGill UniversityHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Ministry of Research, Innovation and ScienceOntario Genomics InstituteGenome Canada
KeywordsChemistryAntibodySteric effectsPeptideDNAConjugated systemHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)VirusGp41Hybridization probeMacromoleculeMolecular biologyVirologyCombinatorial chemistryBiochemistryEpitopeStereochemistryImmunologyBiologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diagnosis of infectious disease in patients, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, can be achieved through the detection of specific antibodies produced by the immune system. We have previously shown that macromolecules such as antibodies can be efficiently detected in complex biological samples by sterically inhibiting the hybridization of conjugated complementary DNA strands to electrode-bound DNA strands. Here, we report a peptide-mediated electrochemical steric hindrance hybridization assay, PeSHHA, specially for the detection of antibodies against the gp41 protein of HIV-1. We show that the sensitivity of this PeSHHA can be significantly enhanced using nanostructured electrodes and demonstrate the rapid, one-step detection of HIV-1 antibodies directly in clinical samples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.693

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical ChemistrySame topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesFrench-language works237,207