Les implications de l'éthique de l'hospitalité en éducation dans un contexte minoritaire francophone
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quand vient le temps de determiner des finalites d'un systeme d'education, inevitablement, les decideurs sont confrontes a des choix lies au contenu d'apprentissages, aux activites d'enseignement, mais fondamentalement, la question des valeurs s'impose. Dans une optique de projet de societe, forcement, le type de projet propose aux enfants et aux jeunes aura un impact sur la facon dont ils entreront en relation les uns avec les autres. Daniel Innerarity (2001) propose l'idee d'une ethique de l'hospitalite qui consiste, entre autres, en « l'apprentissage du commerce productif avec l'alterite, la capacite de se tenir a portee de la realite, de facon qu'elle puisse, comme un visiteur autonome, contredire notre propre savoir et depasser notre propre vouloir » (p. 5). A travers un debat croise sur les positions philosophiques de Charles Taylor, Kant, Derrida et Daniel Innerarity, mais aussi des positions educatives de Jean-Jacques Rousseau, John Dewey et Matthew Lipman, notre projet de recherche cherchera a situer le sens philosophique de l’hospitalite comme un enjeu fondamental de la tolerance et de la reconnaissance, caracteristiques essentielles de l'education au vivre ensemble dans un contexte francophone en milieu minoritaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".