MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2929082203 · doi:10.2118/193844-ms

A Bayesian Sampling Framework With Seismic Priors for Data Assimilation and Uncertainty Quantification

2019· article· en· W2929082203 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Reservoir Simulation Conference · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsComputer scienceSampling (signal processing)Markov chain Monte CarloPrior probabilityUncertainty quantificationAlgorithmEnsemble Kalman filterData assimilationBayesian probabilityPosterior probabilityMonte Carlo methodData miningStatisticsMachine learningArtificial intelligenceMathematicsKalman filter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present a novel sampling algorithm for characterization and uncertainty quantification of heterogeneous multiple facies reservoirs. The method implements a Bayesian inversion framework to estimate physically plausible porosity distributions. This inversion process incorporates data matching at the well locations and constrains the model space by adding a priori information about the sub-surface structure using a seismic impedance volume. The new framework improves predictive performance and the geological realism of the assimilated ensemble through an efficient parameter estimation. The new parameter estimation process enables conditioning data assimilation to characterize the main features of geological uncertainty such as structural, stratigraphic, facies, and petrophysical properties. The proposed workflow uses an ensemble-based Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach combined with sampling probability distributions that are physically meaningful. Moreover, the method targets geostatistical modeling to specific zones in the reservoir. Accordingly, it improves fulfilling the inherent stationarity assumption in geostatistical simulation techniques. Parameter sampling and geostatistical simulations are calculated through an inversion process. In other words, the models fit the known porosity field at the well locations and are structurally consistent within main reservoir compartments, zones, and layers obtained from the seismic impedance volume. The new sampling algorithm ensures that the automated history matching algorithm maintains diversity among ensemble members avoiding underestimation of the uncertainty in the posterior probability distribution. We evaluate the efficiency of the sampling methodology on a synthetic model of a waterflooding field. The predictive capability of the assimilated ensemble is assessed by using production data and dynamic measurements. Also, the qualities of the results are examined by comparing the geological realism of the assimilated ensemble with the reference probability distribution of the model parameters and computing the predicted dynamic data mismatch. Our numerical examples show that incorporating the seismically constrained models as prior information results in an efficient model update scheme and favorable history matching.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.572
Threshold uncertainty score0.866

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it