Vehicle Routing for Resource Management in Time-Phased Deployment of Sensor Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Time-phased sensor-network deployment refers to the delivery of a set of sensors to their predetermined locations at exact times by a fleet of vehicles. Applications for such network deployments include wilderness search and rescue (WiSAR) and wildfire monitoring, where desirable resource management would imply allowing the vehicles to perform other tasks between deliveries. The goal of this paper is, thus, to formulate and solve a vehicle-routing problem (VRP) for such just-in-time time-phased sensor-network deployments. The proposed optimization method for the modified VRP outlined herein has two primary novelties: 1) the consideration of spare time as the objective function and 2) the use of a targeted local-search (LS) method. The spare-time objective function was formulated to address the uniqueness of the modified routing problem at hand. The targeted LS algorithm, on the other hand, was developed to tangibly improve the efficiency of the search for the optimal values of the chosen objective function. The proposed vehicle-route-planning method was validated via a range of simulated WiSAR scenarios, some of which are included herein. The robustness of the method to variations in problem parameters was also investigated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".