Vehicle Routing for Resource Management in Time-Phased Deployment of Sensor Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Time-phased sensor-network deployment refers to the delivery of a set of sensors to their predetermined locations at exact times by a fleet of vehicles. Applications for such network deployments include wilderness search and rescue (WiSAR) and wildfire monitoring, where desirable resource management would imply allowing the vehicles to perform other tasks between deliveries. The goal of this paper is, thus, to formulate and solve a vehicle-routing problem (VRP) for such just-in-time time-phased sensor-network deployments. The proposed optimization method for the modified VRP outlined herein has two primary novelties: 1) the consideration of spare time as the objective function and 2) the use of a targeted local-search (LS) method. The spare-time objective function was formulated to address the uniqueness of the modified routing problem at hand. The targeted LS algorithm, on the other hand, was developed to tangibly improve the efficiency of the search for the optimal values of the chosen objective function. The proposed vehicle-route-planning method was validated via a range of simulated WiSAR scenarios, some of which are included herein. The robustness of the method to variations in problem parameters was also investigated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it