Simulation and optimisation study of the integration of distributed generation and electric vehicles in smart residential district
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents an optimisation methodology for simulating the integration of distributed generation and electric vehicles (EVs) in a residential district. A model of a smart residential district is proposed. Different charging scenarios (CS) for private cars are considered for simulating different power demand distributions during the day. Four different case studies are investigated, namely the Base Case, in which no EVs are present in the district and three study cases with different CSs. A global optimisation method based on a genetic algorithm approach was applied on the model to find the total power from PV panels installed and co-generative micro gas turbines while minimising the annual energy cost in the district for the four different scenarios. In conclusion, the results showed that the use of EVs in the district introduces considerable savings with respect to the Base Case. Moreover, the impact of the chosen CS is nearly insignificant under a purely economic perspective even if it is relevant for grid management. Additionally, the optimum amounts of installed power vary in a limited range if the distance travelled by EVs, users’ departure and arrival time change broadly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".