MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2930242470 · doi:10.26108/b5qm-7w36

The rise of self-efficacy: patient-partner efficacy dynamics in a cardiac rehabilitation context

2019· article· en· W2930242470 on OpenAlex
Meaghan Petersen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAcadiaU-DEV · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Health and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRehabilitationContext (archaeology)Self-efficacyPhysical activityPsychologyRegression analysisMedicinePhysical therapySocial psychologyStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis, completed in response to rising incidences of heart disease, is part of a larger study of factors predicting successful outcomes following participation in a cardiac rehabilitation program involving both patients and their support partners. Data were collected using self-report surveys, along with 6-minute walk test results collected by hospital staff. In this study, both self-efficacy (i.e. belief in one's self) and relation-inferred self-efficacy (RISE; i.e. the perceptions the patient has of their partners belief in them) were examined to determine how they relate to outcomes and whether agreement between the two variables predicts better outcomes overall. Main hypotheses stemming from the previous literature include: (a) higher self-efficacy and RISE will both be related to better outcomes; (b) congruency between self-efficacy and RISE will be associated with better outcomes, particularly when the congruence is found at higher levels of self-efficacy and RISE; and (c) should there be discrepancy between the variables, higher RISE will be associated with better outcomes. The data were analyzed using polynomial regression with response surface analysis with two separate outcome variables of self-reported exercise and 6-minute walk test. Results pertaining to the 6-minute walk test were not statistically significant. With self-reported exercise as the outcome variable, (a) correlational results were insignificant, and thus could not establish a relationship between levels of RISE and self-efficacy and outcomes; (b) a trend was evident wherein increased congruency between levels of self-efficacy and RISE was marginally associated with improved self-reported (p=.09). When there was a discrepancy, contrary to expectations, (c) it was found that outcomes were significantly better when self-efficacy levels surpassed those of RISE(p=.05). This research contributes to the wider literature on efficacy dynamics and congruence in eliefs. Further, it has the potential to inform clinical programs in the future and opens the door to a variety of avenues for further research in various clinical and sport contexts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.370
Threshold uncertainty score0.501

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it