Humanistic burden of patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease - systematic literature review of health-related quality of life and functional status
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a serious complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). This study aims to provide a systematic overview of evidence on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and functional capacity of HSCT patients with National Institutes of Health (NIH)-defined chronic GVHD. Areas covered: English-language articles published between 2007 and 2017 were searched using PubMed. Studies that used the 2005 or 2015 NIH consensus criteria for the diagnosis and staging of chronic GVHD and had a cohort size of at least 100 patients were included. Expert opinion: Disease severity and organ involvement were the most important predictors of HRQoL and functionality in chronic GVHD patients. Further, identified predictors of HRQoL were nutrition status and functional capacity, while functional status was also associated with disease symptoms, nutrition status, age, and survival. Data regarding the effect of symptom bother on HRQoL were limited. Our findings confirm that the management of chronic GVHD should focus on improving not only clinical outcomes but also on HRQoL and functional capacity. Therefore, to evaluate new treatment options it is recommended to include patient relevant endpoints into prospective studies. This study also highlights the importance of nonpharmacological aspects in the management of chronic GVHD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".