MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2931032518 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.00875

The Large Space of Information Structures

2019· preprint· W2931032518 on OpenAlexaff
Fabien Gensbittel, Marcin Pęski, Jérôme Renault

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2019
Typepreprint
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Canadian institutionsCanada Research ChairsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfimum and supremumCombinatoricsCharacterization (materials science)Metric spaceMathematicsSpace (punctuation)Finite setDiscrete mathematicsInformation structureStochastic gameSequence (biology)Interpretation (philosophy)Computer scienceMathematical economicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We revisit the question of modeling incomplete information among 2 Bayesian players, following an ex-ante approach based on values of zero-sum games. $K$ being the finite set of possible parameters, an information structure is defined as a probability distribution $u$ with finite support over $K\times \mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N}$ with the interpretation that: $u$ is publicly known by the players, $(k,c,d)$ is selected according to $u$, then $c$ (resp. $d$) is announced to player 1 (resp. player 2). Given a payoff structure $g$, composed of matrix games indexed by the state, the value of the incomplete information game defined by $u$ and $g$ is denoted $\mathrm{val}(u,g)$. We evaluate the pseudo-distance $d(u,v)$ between 2 information structures $u$ and $v$ by the supremum of $|\mathrm{val}(u,g)-\mathrm{val}(v,g)|$ for all $g$ with payoffs in $[-1,1]$, and study the metric space $Z^*$ of equivalent information structures. We first provide a tractable characterization of $d(u,v)$, as the minimal distance between 2 polytopes, and recover the characterization of Peski (2008) for $u \succeq v$, generalizing to 2 players Blackwell's comparison of experiments via garblings. We then show that $Z^*$, endowed with a weak distance $d_W$, is homeomorphic to the set of consistent probabilities with finite support over the universal belief space of Mertens and Zamir. Finally we show the existence of a sequence of information structures, where players acquire more and more information, and of $\varepsilon>0$ such that any two elements of the sequence have distance at least $\varepsilon$: having more and more information may lead now here. As a consequence, the completion of $(Z^*,d)$ is not compact, hence not homeomorphic to the set of consistent probabilities over the states of the world {\it \`a la} Mertens and Zamir. This example answers by the negative the second (and last unsolved) of the three problems posed by J.F. Mertens in his paper ``Repeated Games", ICM 1986.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.007
Scholarly communication0.0130.023
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.136 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicBayesian Modeling and Causal InferenceFrench-language works237,207